๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.9/5 from 771+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Vintage Y2k Oakley Logo Hat

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.9 out of 5(771 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$60
$100
Sale
โœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

VintageY2kOakleyLogoHat

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
speedy dispatch
โ†ฉ๏ธ
effortless Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Y2k Oakley Logo Hat

Vintage
Y2k
Oakley
Logo
Hat

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 119124

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Hats

Original Price:$100 USD

Sale Price:$60 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.9
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 6994 reviews
JD
John Davidson โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Orlando, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Brilliant Vintage Y2k Oakley Logo Hat
To be fair, the Vintage Y2k Oakley Logo Hat feels solid so no complaints.
32 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Milwaukee, WI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Outstanding!
For the price, the Vintage Y2k Oakley Logo Hat works as described and it meets expectations.
19 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds
3 months ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exceptional quality
For the price, the Vintage Y2k Oakley Logo Hat works as described which feels reasonable.
7 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Portland, OR
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Simply marvelous
After certain use, the Vintage Y2k Oakley Logo Hat feels okay so Iโ€™m okay with it.
27 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Atlanta, GA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Exceptional quality
shipping took a bit longer, but the Vintage Y2k Oakley Logo Hat is okay.
31 people found this helpful