๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.9/5 from 701+ reviews
Kidsโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

Vintage Toddler JCPenney Pants

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.9 out of 5(701 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$10
$16.67
Sale
โœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

size 3 but leading fit is 2tin splendid condition

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-at no charge Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Toddler JCPenney Pants

size 3 but premier fit is 2t
in splendid condition

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 710389

Category: Kids > Boys Bottoms > Boys 2T-5T

Original Price:$16.67 USD

Sale Price:$10 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ at no charge fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.9
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3904 reviews
DA
David Anderson โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Las Vegas, NV
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Really terrific​
The Vintage Toddler JCPenney Pants performs reliably.
42 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 days ago ยท Nashville, TN

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
delightful quality
The Vintage Toddler JCPenney Pants is straightforward and straightforward to handle.
21 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Denver, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Couldn't be happier
So far I appreciate the Vintage Toddler JCPenney Pants.
33 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Fresno, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
impeccable purchase
Honestly, the Vintage Toddler JCPenney Pants feels okay so no complaints. Packaging was easy.
5 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Raleigh, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
first-rate
At first, it feels solid enough which is good enough.
48 people found this helpful