🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 241+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Pyrex gooseberry 443

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(241 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20.25
$33.75
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage gooseberry black on white 443 1960s Cinderella mixing bowl 2.5 quart

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy dispatch
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Pyrex gooseberry 443

Vintage gooseberry black on white 443 1960s Cinderella mixing bowl 2.5 quart

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 752726

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Bowls

Original Price:$33.75 USD

Sale Price:$20.25 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8706 reviews
JB
Justin Baker
10 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
After certain use, it feels okay which feels reasonable.
39 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceptional quality
After various use, the Vintage Pyrex gooseberry 443 works well enough so no complaints.
9 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
really satisfied
The Vintage Pyrex gooseberry 443 arrived in good time.
20 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson
1 week ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
outstanding purchase
The Vintage Pyrex gooseberry 443 is practical for everyday use.​
10 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
To be fair, the Vintage Pyrex gooseberry 443 works well enough which feels reasonable.
40 people found this helpful