๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.9/5 from 188+ reviews
Beautyโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

NPW Soap On A Rope - High Hopes

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.9 out of 5(188 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$11
$18.33
Sale
โœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Product is newly-released and sealed. Retails for $16

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
express delivery
โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-complimentary Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

NPW Soap On A Rope - High Hopes

Product is recent and sealed.

Retails for $16

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 791857

Category: Beauty > Bath & Body > Bath

Original Price:$18.33 USD

Sale Price:$11 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand solely-arrived

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.9
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 1309 reviews

CL
Christopher Lee โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Sacramento, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Absolutely adore it
At first, the NPW Soap On A Rope - High Hopes feels solid and Iโ€™m satisfied. Nothing fancy.
35 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Omaha, NE
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So glad I bought this
Honestly, the NPW Soap On A Rope - High Hopes feels okay and it works for me.
14 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Houston, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
highly happy
The NPW Soap On A Rope - High Hopes feels solid in hand.
22 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Los Angeles, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…​
Absolutely impeccable
From my experience, it works well enough which feels reasonable. Nothing fancy.
46 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Baltimore, MD
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
only what I wanted
The NPW Soap On A Rope - High Hopes seems reliable.
13 people found this helpful