๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 509+ reviews
Womenโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Women's Minimalist vintage Style Solid Color Cloth Hair Tie

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.2 out of 5(509 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
โœ“ gratis delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

None

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-at no charge Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Women's Minimalist timeless Style Solid Color Cloth Hair Tie

None

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 934810

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price:$25 USD

Sale Price:$15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 5460 reviews
EY
Elizabeth Young โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Honolulu, HI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Super happy
The Women's Minimalist timeless Style Solid Color Cloth Hair Tie feels sturdy and reliable.
30 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Oakland, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb for my needs
The Women's Minimalist traditional Style Solid Color Cloth Hair Tie met my needs.
49 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Tampa, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Outstanding!
fabulous value for money. The Women's Minimalist traditional Style Solid Color Cloth Hair Tie quality is impressive.
37 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Nashville, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Totally worth it
The Women's Minimalist vintage Style Solid Color Cloth Hair Tie is functional and uncomplicated.
14 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Tulsa, OK
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
ideal for my needs
After some use, it is practical to use which is good enough.
1 people found this helpful