🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 649+ reviews
Toolsβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Hudson Bay Tomahawk

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(649 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$56
$93.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

O. A. Norlund Hudson Bay Tomahawk in original packaging.10 handle

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy dispatch
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Hudson Bay Tomahawk

O. A. Norlund Hudson Bay Tomahawk in original packaging.
10" handle

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Tools products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1469843

Category: Tools > Hand Tools > Other Hand Tools

Original Price:$93.33 USD

Sale Price:$56 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3898 reviews
SL
Stephanie Lewis
1 week ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic Vintage Hudson Bay Tomahawk
The Vintage Hudson Bay Tomahawk looks fancy the pictures. That’s good.
32 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Seattle, WA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
So far, the Vintage Hudson Bay Tomahawk works fine which is good enough.
6 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore this Vintage Hudson Bay Tomahawk!
In daily use, the Vintage Hudson Bay Tomahawk is effortless to use and I don’t regret it.
29 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints​
Honestly, it is effortless to use so it’s acceptable.
17 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
Honestly, the Vintage Hudson Bay Tomahawk performs as expected and it works for me. Works fine so far.
47 people found this helpful