🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 654+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

LITEWEAR CUT HIPSTER - Briefs

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.7 out of 5(654 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$24.99
$41.65
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Detail : SeamlessRise : NormalPattern : PlainArticle number : 1DK81R012-Q12

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy dispatch
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

LITEWEAR CUT HIPSTER - Briefs

Detail : Seamless
Rise : Normal
Pattern : Plain
Article number : 1DK81R012-Q12

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1604196

Category: Women > Clothing > Underwear

Original Price:$41.65 USD

Sale Price:$24.99 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3860 reviews
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Tucson, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceptional quality​
Happy with the purchase. The LITEWEAR CUT HIPSTER - Briefs is solid.
22 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
cherish it!
Personally, it works fine and I’m satisfied. Works fine so far.
32 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
top LITEWEAR CUT HIPSTER - Briefs ever
Honestly, the LITEWEAR CUT HIPSTER - Briefs performs as expected and it meets expectations. Works fine so far.
11 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 days ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific investment
it works fine so I’m okay with it.
9 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott
7 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
The LITEWEAR CUT HIPSTER - Briefs looks straightforward, but functionally it’s fine.
11 people found this helpful